EU-27 · Market Access PlatformBook a call →

"Eco-friendly," "sustainable," "green" — which product claims are now illegal in the EU?

"Eco-friendly." "Sustainable." "Green." These three words appear on millions of product listings across Amazon, Shopify, Etsy, and other EU-facing marketplaces. From 27 September 2026, using them without specific, verifiable evidence will be an unfair commercial practice under EU law.

5 MIN READ · UPDATED 30 AUGUST 2026 · REVIEWED BY THE REGONANCE EDITORIAL TEAM

"Eco-friendly." "Sustainable." "Green." These three words appear on millions of product listings across Amazon, Shopify, Etsy, and other EU-facing marketplaces. From 27 September 2026, using them without specific, verifiable evidence will be an unfair commercial practice under EU law.

This guide explains which everyday marketing terms are affected, why the EU is cracking down, and how to rewrite your product copy before the deadline.


Why the EU is banning vague green claims

The numbers are damning. A 2020 European Commission study found that 53.3% of environmental product claims in the EU were vague, misleading, or unfounded, and 40% were made without any supporting evidence. Consumers were making purchasing decisions based on environmental claims that could not be verified — and often were not true.

The Empowering Consumers Directive (EmpCo) — Directive (EU) 2024/825 — addresses this directly. It amends the EU Unfair Commercial Practices Directive to treat vague environmental claims as a category of unfair commercial practice, on the same legal footing as false advertising or misleading pricing.

The directive does not ban environmental marketing. It bans environmental marketing that cannot be proven.


The three claims every seller should review

"Eco-friendly"

This is the single most common environmental claim on consumer product listings, and it is almost certainly non-compliant under EmpCo unless accompanied by specific substantiation.

"Eco-friendly" implies that the product is beneficial to — or at least not harmful to — the environment as a whole. That is an extraordinarily broad claim. To substantiate it, you would need to demonstrate that the product excels across all relevant environmental dimensions: raw materials, manufacturing, transport, use, and disposal. No single product attribute (recycled packaging, reduced water use, organic materials) is sufficient to justify an overall "eco-friendly" claim.

Verdict: Effectively banned as a standalone marketing term. Replace with a specific claim about the attribute you can actually prove.

Before: "Eco-friendly phone case made with care for the planet." After: "Phone case made from 70% post-consumer recycled polycarbonate."

"Sustainable"

"Sustainable" is even broader than "eco-friendly." Sustainability encompasses environmental, social, and economic dimensions. A product claim of "sustainable" implies the product performs well across all three — which is essentially impossible to prove comprehensively.

The European Commission's EmpCo FAQ (updated May 2026) makes clear that "sustainable" used as a standalone product descriptor without qualification falls within the prohibition on generic environmental claims.

Verdict: Banned as a standalone marketing term. Can be used if scoped to a specific, substantiated dimension.

Before: "Our sustainable clothing line." After: "Clothing made from GOTS-certified organic cotton, produced in a factory audited under SA8000."

"Green"

When used in an environmental context — "green product," "green collection," "go green" — this term carries the same problem. It implies overall environmental merit without specifying what is green about the product.

"Green" used in a non-environmental context (colour, brand name, etc.) is obviously not affected.

Verdict: Banned as an environmental marketing claim. Replace with specifics.

Before: "Shop our green essentials." After: "Shop products made from certified recycled materials."


Other terms that need attention

Beyond the big three, several other common marketing terms are affected:

"Natural." EmpCo does not specifically list "natural," but the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive already prohibits misleading claims. A product described as "natural" that contains synthetic ingredients or is heavily processed may be challenged. Use "natural" only when it is factually accurate and relevant.

"Non-toxic." This is a factual claim about chemical composition, not a generic environmental endorsement. If true and testable, it can be used — but it should reference a specific standard or testing protocol, not be used as a vague safety claim.

"Biodegradable." This is a specific material property, but it requires qualification. "Biodegradable" without specifying the conditions (industrial composting? Home composting? Marine environment? Timeframe?) is misleading. "Compostable according to EN 13432" is compliant; "biodegradable" alone is not.

"Recyclable." Similar to biodegradable — a material may be technically recyclable but not recyclable in practice in the consumer's location. "Recyclable" should specify where and how. "Packaging is recyclable in household collection in Germany" is specific; "recyclable" alone is vague.

"Plant-based." This is a factual material composition claim, not an environmental claim. If the product is genuinely made from plant-derived materials, the claim is factual. However, using "plant-based" to imply environmental superiority (e.g. "plant-based, better for the planet") crosses into generic environmental claims territory.


The offset trap: "carbon neutral"

This deserves special attention because it affects a large number of brands.

Many products sold in the EU carry "carbon neutral" or "climate neutral" labels. In most cases, these claims are achieved by purchasing carbon credits or offsets — paying another organisation to reduce or capture emissions equivalent to the product's footprint.

EmpCo explicitly prohibits claims of neutral, reduced, or positive environmental impact when they are based on offsetting outside the product's own value chain. This means:

  • "Carbon neutral" based on purchased offsets → illegal from September 27.
  • "Climate neutral certified by [offset scheme]" → illegal from September 27.
  • "CO2 compensated" → illegal from September 27.

The only way to make a carbon neutrality claim under EmpCo is to demonstrate that the neutrality was achieved through actual emissions reductions within the product's own value chain — not through external credits.

If you currently display a "carbon neutral" label or certification mark on your products or listings, review it immediately. If the underlying mechanism is offset-based, the claim must be removed before September 27.


How to rewrite your product copy

The pattern for compliant environmental communication under EmpCo is straightforward:

1. Name one specific attribute. Not "eco-friendly." Instead: "recycled content," "water usage," "energy source," "certified organic."

2. Quantify it. Not "made with recycled materials." Instead: "made from 85% post-consumer recycled polyester."

3. Cite the source. Not "independently verified." Instead: "certified by GOTS," "verified by [named body] under [named standard]."

4. Scope the claim. Not "sustainable product." Instead: "packaging recyclable in German household waste collection."


The enforcement timeline

DateWhat happens
6 March 2024EmpCo published in Official Journal
27 March 2026Member State transposition deadline — EmpCo incorporated into national law
27 September 2026Rules become binding for businesses — no transition period
OngoingNational consumer protection authorities enforce; penalties up to 4% of turnover

Check your claims now

The Regonance EmpCo Checker is a free tool that scans your product URL or pasted marketing copy and flags claims that risk non-compliance. It identifies generic eco-claims, offset-based neutrality language, unrecognised labels, and future commitments without substantiation. Each finding is cited to the specific EmpCo provision it engages.

Check your product claims → free, no account required

For ongoing monitoring across your full catalogue — automatically rescanning when your copy changes — Regonance covers EmpCo alongside GPSR, PPWR, DPP, and other EU mandates in one workspace.

Start free workspace


Educational information only. Not legal advice. National transposition of EmpCo may introduce additional requirements in specific Member States. The European Commission FAQ (May 2026) provides non-binding interpretation guidance. Consult qualified legal advice for your specific situation.

Flag risky claims in 30 seconds — no account

Paste your product copy and see which environmental claims risk breaching the Empowering Consumers Directive before enforcement starts.

Run the free claims check
Free · no account

Every EU deadline, on one page.

Nine mandates, each with dates attached between now and 2030. Get the calendar, plus a note when the guidance behind an article like this one changes.

  • Every applicable EU compliance date
  • Which mandate hits your category first
  • An alert when a rule or guidance changes

No account needed. One-click unsubscribe.

Compliance guidance based on published EU regulatory texts. Not legal advice. Consult qualified counsel for your specific situation.